In response to
"So far, US banks have gotten $163 billion from US taxpayers. Over the next 3 years, guess where half of that is going?"
by
Brian
|
why should shareholders suffer because of policies pushed on them by the gov't? -- nm
Posted by
colin (aka colinski)
Oct 30 '08, 06:50
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
-
why should banks take handouts from the government if they have the excess cash to pay a dividend?
-
ken kutarugi
Oct 30, 06:57
2
-
They don't need to participate; this goes for both the investors in the bank and the banks themselves.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 30, 06:52
9
-
shareholders aren't making money, or are losing money, and they'll start selling off... seems like that would be bad for the bank. -- nm
-
colin
Oct 30, 06:53
8
-
If you ask for a handout to stay afloat, I'm thinking maybe your stock price is a secondary concern.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 30, 06:55
2
-
i really can't believe you are okay with your tax dollars going to someone else's pocket as, essentially, revenue. -- nm
-
Halloween Candie
Oct 30, 06:54
2
-
Shareholders would sell off, or lose all of their investment, if the banks fail.
-
ty97
Oct 30, 06:54
-
... bank needs money, bank gets money, bank gives money away? How does it make sense? -- nm
-
Beryllium McGee
Oct 30, 06:54
-
why should the shareholders be paid by the us government. -- nm
-
tRuMaN
Oct 30, 06:51
18
-
it's all money..just because shareholders are now being paid, does that mean its out of the money given to the banks? -- nm
-
colin
Oct 30, 06:55
17
-
Dividends should only be paid when the business is doing well. That's what dividends *ARE*. -- nm
-
Beryllium McGee
Oct 30, 06:56
16
-
exactly. you get paid dividends on your *investment*. like any other investment, if the company you invested in does poorly, you can lose your
-
Halloween Candie
Oct 30, 06:59
15
-
it wouldn't have done poorly if the gov't hadn't mandated crap lending rules. -- nm
-
colin
Oct 30, 07:03
14
-
kidding, right? -- nm
-
slutty zombie loosilu
Oct 30, 07:11
-
This isn't the "blame the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and Fannie and Freddie" argument, is it?
-
Brian
Oct 30, 07:08
-
Shockingly, there are banks who aren't going bankrupt becuase they didn't rush forward to the highest limits the govt allowed.
-
Will Hunting
Oct 30, 07:05
-
um, no that is totally wrong. It was a lack of regulation and the greed of the banks that caused the problem -- nm
-
decline
Oct 30, 07:05
-
honestly, i'm not sure you really have a good grasp of the landscape on this stuff...nm,
-
x
Oct 30, 07:05
9
-
you're joking, right?
-
Halloween Candie
Oct 30, 06:51
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|