ST Alpha - "4:46? Like they would have spent 47.75M!!! -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Apparently Fox wouldn't let 84 Lumber air their full ad, which is why we had to see it online. -- (link)" by Mop

4:46? Like they would have spent 47.75M!!! -- nm

Posted by Spawn Feb 6 '17, 09:00

(No message)

Responses:

They edited to the SB ad length and released the longer one online. - spamlet Feb 6, 09:02 3
- I know, just not sure how they could have made that one fit. - Spawn Feb 6, 09:13 2
  - I would think the wall would have been the money shot for the whole commercial though. -- nm - groiny Feb 6, 09:14 1
    - Yeah, but if they got there and found the door immediately it would feel hollow. - Spawn Feb 6, 09:17
This is why I call Bullshit. -- nm - Ender Feb 6, 09:01 2
- It's not BS. Fox clearly rejected a shortened version intended for air -- (edited) - ty97 Feb 6, 09:06 1
  - CENSORSHIP! I hear Trump called Fox and said he'd revoke their FCC license if they didn't pull the ad! -- nm - Mop Feb 6, 09:17

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.