|
In response to
"The ruling from the 3-judge panel of the 9th Circuit is unanimous. All against the ban -- (link)"
by
amoxy
|
Slightly nuanced caveat: It doesn't look like the 9th Circuit ruled on the merits of the ban itself. They only ruled that ...
|
... the federal government had not made a good case for lifting the stay. The federal district court is still moving forward on the substance and merits of the ban itself, and that will likely also end up in the Ninth Circuit, but for now, this decision is more a procedural one than a substantive one.
|
Responses:
|