Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 166
Hypothetical
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Feb 15 '17, 12:47
State X has an election in 2012
R: White
D: Black
State X implements Strict Voter ID in 2014
State X has an election in 2016
R: White
D: White
Turnout gap for Blacks increases in 2016 vs 2012.
How can we be sure that the Voter ID change in 2014 caused the increase?
Responses:
[deleted]
That's why they looked across a broader spectrum than a single race. Or narrowed it to looking only at democrats.
-
pmb
Feb 15, 12:50
7
My point
-
Strongbad
Feb 15, 12:58
6
[deleted]
5
Their implied conclusion is causation.
-
Strongbad
Feb 15, 13:19
4
[deleted]
3
I am not trying to disprove causation.
-
Strongbad
Feb 15, 13:28
2
[deleted]
1
of the 2 sets of additional data I have brought up in this thread
-
Strongbad
Feb 15, 14:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.