of the 2 sets of additional data I have brought up in this thread
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Feb 15 '17, 14:00
|
1 is absolutely mathematically relevant to the conclusion, it's the raw data from the paper that the entire conclusion was based on.
Of the 5000 races that were analyzed and averaged to give us the graph in the article, I want to know how many of those individual 5000 races had a statistically significant increase, a statistically significant decrease, or no effect.
|