Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 11:29
2: Dec 11, 07:59
3: Dec 10, 18:15
4: Dec 10, 12:28
5: Dec 10, 09:30
6: Dec 10, 05:59
7: Dec 9, 17:07
8: Dec 9, 13:47
9: Dec 9, 10:33
10: Dec 9, 07:33
11: Dec 8, 17:50
12: Dec 8, 10:32
13: Dec 8, 06:23
14: Dec 7, 16:52
15: Dec 7, 07:17
16: Dec 6, 14:40
17: Dec 6, 10:07
18: Dec 6, 07:32
19: Dec 5, 19:48
20: Dec 5, 12:51
Posts: 152
NWBR: Perot's pull was equally split along ideology, and a sliiight favourite to R over D. -- (link)
Posted by
Reagen
Feb 17 '17, 13:20
(No message)
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-1992/
(ropercenter.cornell.edu)
Responses:
Okay. So maybe 2-to-1 is too much, but I think it's still pretty clear which way it would have gone in a normal cycle. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Feb 17, 13:24
2
probably a bit of a mistake to project today's bitter partisan lines on a 24 year old election.
-
Reagen
Feb 17, 13:27
1
Oh sure, but then there would have been Democrats as well who didn't like Clinton on moral grounds. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Feb 17, 13:40
turnout was also up 5% so he likely brought in a number of "wouldn't haves" -- nm
-
Reagen
Feb 17, 13:23
1
Yeah, I assume that's the independents he pulled. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Feb 17, 13:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
