ST Alpha - "Trump's eagerness to take credit for job numbers he had nothing to do with may have violated long standing rules on commenting on economic data -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

Trump's eagerness to take credit for job numbers he had nothing to do with may have violated long standing rules on commenting on economic data -- (link)

Posted by znufrii, definitely not 40 (aka znufrii) Mar 10 '17, 09:06

(No message)

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/february-jobs-report-trump-white-house.html (mobile.nytimes.com)

Responses:

Man, the line between great and not great was thinner than I thought. -- nm - Reagen Mar 10, 09:13
Wasn't Trump tweeting about it *yesterday*? -- nm - Spawn Mar 10, 09:09
this is surprising to no one. -- nm - Diva Mar 10, 09:08
Eh, he does not believe in them anyway. Right? -- nm - Spawn Mar 10, 09:07
You think he gives a f*** about long-standing rules? -- nm - amoxy Mar 10, 09:07 6
- rules are just words if they are not enforced -- nm - decline Mar 10, 09:12
- I remember when he said the 4.9% Unemployment rate could actually really be 45%. He will say a-ny-thing. -- nm - Diva Mar 10, 09:09 3
  - "they may have been phony in the past but it's very real now." -- nm - decline Mar 10, 11:06
  - I seriously do not know what he will say or do to get his supporters and Congress to wake up - amoxy Mar 10, 09:13
  - And now it could actually be 0.000001%. -- nm - SCPOTUS Mar 10, 09:11
- he truly don't -- nm - Epiphany Mar 10, 09:08

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.