Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 154
In response to
"
wouldn't this be the very definition of "cuck"?
"
by
Mel Profit
No. A cuck is automatically a submissive, but not all submissives would be cucks. -- nm
Posted by
Name Withheld by Request (aka BlueKopo)
Mar 22 '17, 07:15
(No message)
Responses:
seems pretty submissive to me. -- nm
-
Mel Profit
Mar 22, 07:18
4
My understanding is that a second guy is involved with the wife to set up a cuck situation. Not sure who you have in mind for your metaphor to work. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Mar 22, 07:23
3
There's the classic definition, which is what you're taking about, and the alt-right version which basically comes down to
-
Reagen
Mar 22, 07:43
2
I appoint you Mel's Translator.
-
Mel Profit
Mar 22, 07:51
1
I know that we love to point out any hypocrisy in that worldview, but I still don't see it. See my comment above. -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 22, 07:54
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
