Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 164
In response to
"
Office debate picking up off a story in the national media today: The marriage lasted five years. Should alimony last a lifetime?
"
by
Name Withheld by Request
It's really up to what the parties agree and what the court decides. -- nm
Posted by
Roger More (aka rogermore)
Mar 24 '17, 07:31
(No message)
Responses:
This is the point of the discussion. He's 45. The marriage was a mistake. No pre-nup, so it came down to the judge and he said lifetime alimony.
-
Name Withheld by Request
Mar 24, 07:40
4
The general answer is 'no', and in this specific case on the facts in Blatchford's article, I'd support varying the court order.
-
Roger More
Mar 24, 08:10
some decrees have alimony end if the person receiving it remarries. Was this part of the deal? -- nm
-
Diva
Mar 24, 07:55
1
Doesn't look like the article mentions that. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Mar 24, 08:04
(And to be clear, this isn't child support payments. Just spousal support.) -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Mar 24, 07:41
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
