|
In response to
"This is the point of the discussion. He's 45. The marriage was a mistake. No pre-nup, so it came down to the judge and he said lifetime alimony."
by
Name Withheld by Request
|
The general answer is 'no', and in this specific case on the facts in Blatchford's article, I'd support varying the court order.
Posted by
Roger More (aka rogermore)
Mar 24 '17, 08:10
|
But the case itself is weird - does the court order vary from provincial guidelines (as it seems to, though it's a decade-old divorce and the guidelines may have changed in the meantime), and if so why was it agreed to by the man's lawyer, and signed off by the judge?
|