Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 151
Politico tick-tock on how the Freedom Caucus made a pact among themselves weeks ago regarding AHCA -- (link)
Posted by
ty97
Mar 26 '17, 08:55
(No message)
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-freedom-caucus-obamacare-repeal-replace-secret-pact-236507
(www.politico.com)
Responses:
Mind you, I'm not convinced this bill passes the House even if every FC member votes yes, but they provided cover to the more moderate members
-
ty97
Mar 26, 08:55
16
And I'm not sure I understand the FC on this one. If they got everything they wanted, it never would have passed the Senate.
-
ty97
Mar 26, 08:57
15
Because they don't want governance. They want exactly what they promised and won on. Complete repeal.
-
Will Hunting
Mar 26, 09:03
14
But they have to know that unwinnable. Assuming they do (maybe they don't?) I can't see their endgame. -- nm*
-
ty97
Mar 26, 09:12
13
They are idealogues; which is very close to idiotlogues. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Mar 26, 09:25
I doubt they care. -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 26, 09:13
11
Maybe not, but it doesn't make any sense to me.
-
ty97
Mar 26, 09:16
10
Because they've sold their constituents a bill of goods and they'll be damned, or worse, voted out, if they allow for the slightest bit of compromise. -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 26, 09:33
9
But now they take the blame (rightly or wrongly) for Obamacare remaining. Is that better? -- nm
-
ty97
Mar 26, 09:56
8
Enough of what they found objectionable would have remained anyway that it made no difference. -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 26, 10:34
4
I'm trying to suss out the political optics of it. Theoretically, someone could primary these guys for 'blocking Obamacare repeal' -- nm
-
ty97
Mar 26, 10:50
3
If they were only out to repeal Obamacare for the sake of saying they repealed Obamacare, sure, but I don't think that is the case for them.
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 26, 11:30
2
Still, there *could* be election consequences -- nm
-
ty97
Mar 26, 11:39
1
Nah, they'll just blame congress -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 26, 11:44
I definitely understand your point. But you're applying logic to legislators and their constituents who up to this point have not operated or thought -- (edited)
-
Diva
Mar 26, 10:01
To the people that vote for them, yes. -- nm
-
Bacon
Mar 26, 09:57
1
perhaps it is, I'm just not sure -- nm
-
ty97
Mar 26, 10:02
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.