ST Alpha - "But now they take the blame (rightly or wrongly) for Obamacare remaining. Is that better? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Because they've sold their constituents a bill of goods and they'll be damned, or worse, voted out, if they allow for the slightest bit of compromise. -- nm" by znufrii, definitely not 40

But now they take the blame (rightly or wrongly) for Obamacare remaining. Is that better? -- nm

Posted by ty97 Mar 26 '17, 09:56

(No message)

Responses:

Enough of what they found objectionable would have remained anyway that it made no difference. -- nm - znufrii, definitely not 40 Mar 26, 10:34 4
- I'm trying to suss out the political optics of it. Theoretically, someone could primary these guys for 'blocking Obamacare repeal' -- nm - ty97 Mar 26, 10:50 3
  - If they were only out to repeal Obamacare for the sake of saying they repealed Obamacare, sure, but I don't think that is the case for them. - znufrii, definitely not 40 Mar 26, 11:30 2
    - Still, there *could* be election consequences -- nm - ty97 Mar 26, 11:39 1
      - Nah, they'll just blame congress -- nm - znufrii, definitely not 40 Mar 26, 11:44
I definitely understand your point. But you're applying logic to legislators and their constituents who up to this point have not operated or thought -- (edited) - Diva Mar 26, 10:01
To the people that vote for them, yes. -- nm - Bacon Mar 26, 09:57 1
- perhaps it is, I'm just not sure -- nm - ty97 Mar 26, 10:02

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.