Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 150
That's interesting but not surprising - US precedent is pretty much irrelevant in British Commonwealth jurisdictions, and I expect in most
Posted by
Roger More - yiyiyiyiyiyiyi! (aka RogerMore)
May 1 '09, 08:17
European jurisdictions also
Responses:
My hunch is that this is mostly correct as well.
-
Name Withheld By Request
May 1, 08:20
3
[deleted]
2
Really? I wouldn't have thought ours to be the most cited either unless for reasons of similar-type systems. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
May 1, 08:29
1
[deleted]
[deleted]
3
I'm speaking from my own experience studying law in Australia. If we couldn't find a relevant case from Australia, the hierarchy was Britain, then
-
Roger More - yiyiyiyiyiyiyi!
May 1, 08:27
2
[deleted]
1
I haven't thought seriously about law in 10 years, and I didn't use the word 'precedent' correctly
-
Roger More - yiyiyiyiyiyiyi!
May 1, 08:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
