Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 153
It definitely is still early, but who would have thought that one of the most *potentially* damaging things to the GOP would be....winning -- nm
Posted by
ty97
Mar 30 '17, 07:24
(No message)
Responses:
Could it be that "Republican" is too broad a term and that the FC should really be its own party? -- nm
-
Max
Mar 30, 07:30
5
I think without ranked choice voting, it's political suicide to identify as third-party. We're stuck with poorly-defined factions. -- nm
-
mara
Mar 30, 07:36
3
Nobody would willingly split off, but I just mean maybe things would make more sense if an arbiter forced a 3-party system.
-
Max
Mar 30, 07:40
1
It *would* make more sense, and that's why ranked-choice voting makes more sense. :-) -- nm*
-
mara
Mar 30, 07:55
yep -- nm
-
ty97
Mar 30, 07:38
Both parties have factions that differ somewhat significantly in what they want, but we are so tied to the two parties, you basically have to choose
-
ty97
Mar 30, 07:33
The analogy of the dog finally catching the car is more and more apt. -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Mar 30, 07:26
*raises hand* I've been saying for months, Give them everything they want. They can't handle it.
-
Will Hunting
Mar 30, 07:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.