Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 153
In response to
"
Could it be that "Republican" is too broad a term and that the FC should really be its own party? -- nm
"
by
Max
I think without ranked choice voting, it's political suicide to identify as third-party. We're stuck with poorly-defined factions. -- nm
Posted by
mara
Mar 30 '17, 07:36
(No message)
Responses:
Nobody would willingly split off, but I just mean maybe things would make more sense if an arbiter forced a 3-party system.
-
Max
Mar 30, 07:40
1
It *would* make more sense, and that's why ranked-choice voting makes more sense. :-) -- nm*
-
mara
Mar 30, 07:55
yep -- nm
-
ty97
Mar 30, 07:38
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.