ST Alpha - "It would be completely wrong and utterly proper to do. Revised hopes inside -- (edited)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "What do you think would happen" by Strongbad

It would be completely wrong and utterly proper to do. Revised hopes inside -- (edited)

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Mar 30 '17, 09:36

They say sure, here's your confirmation hearings, make it very clear during such that he will not be confirmed and then vote him down via a unanimous caucus.

"We gave him a chance, which is more then the GOP did an equally qualified person. Sucks, but hey...we did our job."

Responses:

This. The GOP set precedent and the Dems would be foolish not to follow it. - TWuG Mar 30, 09:47 3
- Eye for an eye! - Spawn Mar 30, 10:08 2
  - Ah, but the quote isn't "an eye for an eye" it is "no more than an eye for an eye" - TWuG Mar 30, 10:12 1
    - yup - I don't care how ugly it looks. I think most people get the concept of why this is happening -- nm - Epiphany Mar 30, 10:19

Post a message top

It would be completely wrong and utterly proper to do. Revised hopes inside -- (edited)

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.