Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 153
In response to
"
When Team #1 averages 35 points per game and the final score is 17-14...I'm not giving the winning QB all that much credit.
"
by
Will Hunting
You might not, but the voters decided he was the game's MVP. -- nm
Posted by
Da5id (aka David)
Apr 12 '17, 10:46
(No message)
Responses:
I think most voters were loathe to split their votes 4-ways.
-
Will Hunting
Apr 12, 10:52
2
You can use that 'but, if' clause for every single game in the history of sports. It's a shit argument.
-
Shaun
Apr 12, 10:58
1
But, if....I'm not arguing who won -- the Giants won (and deserved to)
-
Will Hunting
Apr 12, 11:04
But David he didn't do anything useful. He was just there for shits n giggs and was useless.
-
Shaun
Apr 12, 10:51
1
I'm sorry I dared to insinuate your QB who only scored 17 points (7 of which are due to an outright miracle play)
-
Will Hunting
Apr 12, 10:57
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
