Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 151
In response to
"
I do as well but his art work wasn't commissioned, he placed it in front of the NYSE illegally one night.
"
by
Krusty
I think his argument fails to qualify for the copyright statute. His work wasn't modified. Plus once it's in public you lose control of what it means
Posted by
Max
Apr 12 '17, 19:26
It would be different if the other artist placed the girl on the bull's back.
Responses:
Your second argument is the more important one, imho. -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
Apr 12, 19:39
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.