Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 174
In response to
"
Poll: what three-hour movies are a tight three hours? -- nm
"
by
Roger More
Avatar. -- nm
Posted by
Da5id (aka David)
Apr 20 '17, 09:40
(No message)
Responses:
2hrs and 42 minutes -- nm
-
eag
Apr 20, 09:41
3
Is that the full length? Or just how much they could have cut? -- nm
-
Ender
Apr 20, 10:01
Don't be a pedant. -- nm
-
Da5id
Apr 20, 10:00
dammit David -- nm
-
groiny
Apr 20, 09:43
it is between this and Green Mile for me, at least in slow parts in Avatar, you can look at pretty things. -- nm
-
groiny
Apr 20, 09:41
8
The pretty things effect wore off after about an hour into the movie
-
eag
Apr 20, 09:43
5
Absolutely disagree. The attack on Home Tree and the final battle are technical marvels.
-
Shaun
Apr 20, 09:47
3
Yeah when I first watched in a theater it was gorgeous and well made especially in 3d
-
eag
Apr 20, 10:29
the only movie where I felt that the extra $ for 3D was worth it and it was the first one.. -- nm
-
Beaker
Apr 20, 09:48
1
Becuase James Cameron is a tremendously talented asshole... -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Apr 20, 09:55
I disagree alot. -- nm
-
groiny
Apr 20, 09:44
aint I pretty? -- nm
-
percy Wetmore
Apr 20, 09:43
Big league visuals. -- nm
-
Shaun
Apr 20, 09:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
