ST Alpha - "More accurately..." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "Under the GOP's health plan, sexual assault would be considered a preexisting condition -- (link)" by ty97

More accurately...

Posted by Mop (aka rburriel) May 3 '17, 21:35

Under Obamacare, sexual assault, domestic violence, and other "conditions" were explicitly stated as conditions under which you could NOT deny coverage, but the GOP would wipe away that entire list and let states decide what was and wasn't covered.

Responses:

What I posted was accurate. -- nm - ty97 May 3, 21:48 7
- You're both right. -- nm - . May 3, 22:34
- if the insurance companies decide to make it so. They could choose not to. -- nm - Max May 3, 21:51 5
  - The law will define it a pre-existing condition. The states will have the option whether to remove pre-existing protections or not. - ty97 May 3, 21:53 4
    - Where is the text of the amendment with those definitions? -- nm - Max May 4, 01:49 2
      - Ask the GOP please. -- nm - ty97 May 4, 05:12 1
        
        Don't you fucking shout at me and call me pollyanna and claim your statement is accurate if you don't have evidence to back it up. - Max May 4, 08:02
    - But appreciate your Pollyanna view of insurance companies' caring nature -- nm - ty97 May 3, 21:53

Post a message top

More accurately...

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.