Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 173
In response to
"
"The Trump administration is taking the unusual step of hunting for evidence of crimes committed by Haitian immigrants " -- (link)
"
by
ty97
All the Centrists, Libertarians (a specific f*ck you), and Bernie supporters. You were warned this would happen. You were warned.
Posted by
MDH (aka MDH)
May 9 '17, 06:28
All you that voted anyone other than Clinton, you are complicit in this.
Responses:
Granted, a whole bunch of people could play the "You were warned that Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate" card too. -- (edited)
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 06:53
20
aka "She's a woman." because otherwise she wasn't. -- nm
-
MDH
May 9, 07:01
1
See below. I am utterly 100% confident that the USA is ready to elect a woman. Just not any woman.
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:04
Except, she wasn't.
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
May 9, 06:57
6
Her negatives throughout the campaign were at historical levels. Whether fairly or not, she was never going to be one of the better candidates.
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:02
5
Which, as we've been seeing in the time since the election, were based on bullshit. -- nm
-
Reagen
May 9, 07:10
2
She was an outlier of negative opinion for far longer than one election cycle. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:18
1
See this chart. She was running 40%+ negatives as far back as Fall of 2013. -- (link)
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:20
[Image]
Her negatives were the historic ones, right...did you see who the other candidate was? -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
May 9, 07:06
1
Ignore the other candidate for just one moment. In January 2015, well before he entered the race, she was still a poor Democratic candidate choice. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:06
yes, they're the same, it's all equal, blah blah blah fuck off -- nm
-
ty97
May 9, 06:53
10
Fuck you ty if you can't be civil. I've kept my head down for awhile here to give you guys some space to wallow, but if you can't... -- (edited)
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:00
9
Using the word "wallow" says a lot, dude. -- nm
-
David's iPad
May 9, 07:03
8
It's how it is coming off David. [Edit: Would have "grieve" been less egregious? Realizing I may not have used the right word to convey the point. ] -- nm*
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:04
7
Some people who actually believe in American ideals getting upset when a guy who couldn't name them spends his first months in pissing on them...
-
Will Hunting
May 9, 07:10
3
Guys, I never wrote one pro-Trump word in this thread. Here's what I was replying to:
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:17
2
You're the one who used the term wallow about those complaining.
-
Will Hunting
May 9, 07:27
1
And that's fair. See my edit. I withdraw the use of wallow in favour of grieve. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:30
i think the problem is that Trump is doing many things that people here find appalling. And knowing that basically no other candidate (either party)
-
Andie
May 9, 07:09
1
I wasn't comparing them. People are projecting that. I saw this as reply to a complaint about Bernie Bros and such. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 07:13
Grieve would have been fine. -- nm
-
David's iPad
May 9, 07:08
They were warned. They were given an explanation. Nevertheless.... -- nm
-
znufrii, definitely not 40
May 9, 06:35
7
This is a great place for "you can't fix stupid." But I want them to join the fold, so we've got to find a way to reach them. -- nm
-
MDH
May 9, 06:37
6
Saying they are complicit won't work though. It may be true, but people don't want to hear it. -- nm
-
Roger More
May 9, 06:38
5
*shrug* But "fuck my feelings" right?
-
Mel Profit
May 9, 06:47
1
Sure, but do it in a way that doesn't alienate people who can be won over to your side. -- nm
-
Roger More
May 9, 06:57
Oh I know. It's obviously not saying you can say to them (just here!). Got to figure out how to change versus beating them down
-
MDH
May 9, 06:39
2
The problem with their attitude "about liberals" as they always say their being talked down to.
-
Mel Profit
May 9, 06:56
I think it applies here too. -- nm
-
Roger More
May 9, 06:44
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.