ST Alpha - "Her negatives throughout the campaign were at historical levels. Whether fairly or not, she was never going to be one of the better candidates." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 173

In response to "Except, she wasn't." by znufrii, definitely not 40

Her negatives throughout the campaign were at historical levels. Whether fairly or not, she was never going to be one of the better candidates.

Posted by Name Withheld by Request (aka BlueKopo) May 9 '17, 07:02

She ran a poor campaign strategy in 2008 and lost to Obama and wouldn't you know it? She ran a poor campaign strategy against Bernie in the primaries and against Trump in the general.

Responses:

Which, as we've been seeing in the time since the election, were based on bullshit. -- nm - Reagen May 9, 07:10 2
- She was an outlier of negative opinion for far longer than one election cycle. -- nm - Name Withheld by Request May 9, 07:18 1
  - See this chart. She was running 40%+ negatives as far back as Fall of 2013. -- (link) - Name Withheld by Request May 9, 07:20 [Image]
Her negatives were the historic ones, right...did you see who the other candidate was? -- nm - znufrii, definitely not 40 May 9, 07:06 1
- Ignore the other candidate for just one moment. In January 2015, well before he entered the race, she was still a poor Democratic candidate choice. -- nm - Name Withheld by Request May 9, 07:06

Post a message top

Her negatives throughout the campaign were at historical levels. Whether fairly or not, she was never going to be one of the better candidates.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.