Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
had the roles been reversed, and Hillary was a president, and Bill was running for President years later
Posted by
groiny (aka groiny)
May 9 '17, 07:58
I expect the last one would be the same in reverse.
Responses:
[deleted]
9
and yet, I managed to vote for her despite all that.
-
groiny
May 9, 08:04
8
Thank you for that.
-
David
May 9, 08:40
1
alot of good it did. -- nm
-
groiny
May 9, 08:42
[deleted]
5
it is a combination of all of the above, in reality.
-
groiny
May 9, 08:12
4
This is a good post. -- nm
-
David
May 9, 08:43
She lost by 0.8% in WI, 0.2% in MI, and 0.7% in PA. Argument could be made that there were enough people who wouldn't vote for a woman
-
ty97
May 9, 08:20
2
There would have been a block of voters casting HRC ballots *because* she was a woman. Anyone seen any articles or data figuring out the difference? -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
May 9, 08:29
1
I would have thought this in advance. I'm not convinced in hindsight to be honest. (but no, seen no analysis) -- nm*
-
ty97
May 9, 08:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.