ST Alpha - "it is a combination of all of the above, in reality." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

it is a combination of all of the above, in reality.

Posted by groiny (aka groiny) May 9 '17, 08:12

sure a % of voters did not vote for her because she is a woman

sure a % of voters did not vote for her because they think she is too ambitious

Sure a % of voters did not vote for her because they viewed her standing by her cheating husband just to ride his coattails upwards.

At the end of the day, those % added up, and once you take the people on the fence, and throw an email scandal in there, with people on the line between, now seeing her once again as untrustworthy, you have a recipe for disaster.

Responses:

This is a good post. -- nm - David May 9, 08:43
She lost by 0.8% in WI, 0.2% in MI, and 0.7% in PA. Argument could be made that there were enough people who wouldn't vote for a woman - ty97 May 9, 08:20 2
- There would have been a block of voters casting HRC ballots *because* she was a woman. Anyone seen any articles or data figuring out the difference? -- nm - Name Withheld by Request May 9, 08:29 1
  - I would have thought this in advance. I'm not convinced in hindsight to be honest. (but no, seen no analysis) -- nm* - ty97 May 9, 08:42

Post a message top

it is a combination of all of the above, in reality.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.