ST Alpha - "She lost by 0.8% in WI, 0.2% in MI, and 0.7% in PA. Argument could be made that there were enough people who wouldn't vote for a woman" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

In response to "it is a combination of all of the above, in reality." by groiny

She lost by 0.8% in WI, 0.2% in MI, and 0.7% in PA. Argument could be made that there were enough people who wouldn't vote for a woman

Posted by ty97 May 9 '17, 08:20

to make those swings on their own.

Is that the case? Don't know, doubt it could ever be proven either way, but it's not other-wordly to consider it a possibility

Responses:

There would have been a block of voters casting HRC ballots *because* she was a woman. Anyone seen any articles or data figuring out the difference? -- nm - Name Withheld by Request May 9, 08:29 1
- I would have thought this in advance. I'm not convinced in hindsight to be honest. (but no, seen no analysis) -- nm* - ty97 May 9, 08:42

Post a message top

She lost by 0.8% in WI, 0.2% in MI, and 0.7% in PA. Argument could be made that there were enough people who wouldn't vote for a woman

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.