Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
Wonder Woman $58.2 million. A 43% decline. Only Spider-Man had a better second weekend drop. -- (link)
Posted by
Inigo (aka Inigo)
Jun 12 '17, 08:35
(No message)
$400 million domestically isn't out of the question.
(deadline.com)
Responses:
Also, The Mummy is a bomb. Tom Cruise is fading as a box office star. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jun 12, 08:38
21
Counterpoint: Tom Cruise has only been a modest box office star over his career. "Movie Star" = yes.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 08:49
7
He had five consecutive $100M grossers in the 90s when $100M meant something.
-
Roger More
Jun 12, 09:48
And as I said over the weekend, his HSX IPO is a formula for more failure. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jun 12, 08:56
2
I read that concept and I'm intrigued at least.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 09:01
1
I just don't think *he* is the right type for it. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jun 12, 09:03
His films never had huge openings, but adjusted for inflation, he has 9 films that have grossed over $200 million. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jun 12, 08:54
1
But that means they've all run out legs-wise which gets to David's point about quality. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 09:03
He lost three years in there to Eyes Wide Shut and maybe 4 to Oprah. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 12, 08:53
Contra: this easily could have been a sub 20 film without him. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 12, 08:48
5
I guess? I think The Rock, Pratt, etc..probably would have opened it a bit higher, too.
-
Inigo
Jun 12, 09:00
3
I'm not even sold Pratt would have -- he had a big time chance with Passengers with the biggest female star alive
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 09:02
2
That was largely a marketing fail. I mean, I understand why as it was not an easy movie to market. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jun 12, 09:04
1
Maybe not, but if Pratt was a box-office star, you wouldn't need more than him and JLaw's faces doing Pratt and JLaw stuff to open notably.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 09:17
I'd watch Cruise in a Contra vidya game movie. -- nm
-
Qale
Jun 12, 08:50
I'm a tom cruise fan, mostly, except for the crazy. I wouldn't go near that movie no matter who was in it.
-
Beryllium
Jun 12, 08:42
You could have given the role to Dwayne Johnson or Chris Pratt and I think people would have still identified it as a stinker. -- nm*
-
Max
Jun 12, 08:39
3
Reminder: Universal has *9* more films in the pipe they wanted to piggyback off this -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 12, 08:54
1
I'm continually amazed by how little studios understand the value of a quality film. -- nm
-
David
Jun 12, 08:57
I agree with this completely. I feel like the advertising was all about the effects, not cruise. -- nm
-
amanda jones state university
Jun 12, 08:46
All that international $. -- nm
-
Shaun
Jun 12, 08:39
1
$175 Worldwide -- nm
-
Remlik
Jun 12, 08:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.