Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
In response to
"
Contra: this easily could have been a sub 20 film without him. -- nm
"
by
Reagen
I guess? I think The Rock, Pratt, etc..probably would have opened it a bit higher, too.
Posted by
Inigo (aka Inigo)
Jun 12 '17, 09:00
I'm not saying his name has zero value. It's just not where it was 15 years ago, but no one's star value stays the same forever.
Responses:
I'm not even sold Pratt would have -- he had a big time chance with Passengers with the biggest female star alive
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 09:02
2
That was largely a marketing fail. I mean, I understand why as it was not an easy movie to market. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jun 12, 09:04
1
Maybe not, but if Pratt was a box-office star, you wouldn't need more than him and JLaw's faces doing Pratt and JLaw stuff to open notably.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 12, 09:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.