ST Alpha - "yes -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Check Twitters info: does the Senate bill differ from House bill on exclusions for pre-existing conditions of policy holders? -- nm" by Epiphany

yes -- nm

Posted by decline (aka Decline) Jun 23 '17, 07:06

(No message)

Responses:

why isn't that specifically getting more media traction? I'd think it'd be a huge selling point. -- nm - Epiphany Jun 23, 07:12 12
- plus, while the ban for pre-existing is gone, States would be able to opt-out of the ban on annual and lifetime limits - decline Jun 23, 07:36 1
  - ah there it is. "You're covered, it's just that the coverage is zero." -- nm - Reagen Jun 23, 07:52
- Because the rest of the bill is awful for most of us and they're pointing out the many issues rather than the - Krusty Jun 23, 07:26 1
  - Isn't *as* terrible. - znufrii Jun 23, 07:27
- [deleted] 1
  - Right? "This will be achieved through magic and or robots." -- nm - Reagen Jun 23, 07:22
- Because the media's specifically not trying to sell it. -- nm - Ender Jun 23, 07:16 5
  - the media didn't write either shit bill. it's not the media's fault the bills are both shit. Republicans wrote both shitty bills. Not the media. -- nm - Diva Jun 23, 07:31 2
    - [deleted]
    - But this ones slightly less shitty! We should be celebrating! -- nm - znufrii Jun 23, 07:34
  - [deleted]
  - It's a shame since Senate Republicans have been so eager to share what's in the bill! -- nm - Reagen Jun 23, 07:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.