ST Alpha - "I'm a bit annoyed at the court for being so vague. They should have defined who counts and who doesn't. Leaving it up to the -- (edited)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "Stepsister, Yes; Grandma, No: U.S. Sets Guidelines for Revised Travel Ban -- (link)" by ty97

I'm a bit annoyed at the court for being so vague. They should have defined who counts and who doesn't. Leaving it up to the -- (edited)

Posted by Krusty (aka krustylu) Jun 29 '17, 05:35

administration you get crap like this where a brother-in-law counts but a grandmother doesn't. Makes no sense. I expect we'll see a lawsuit about this now.

Responses:

[deleted] 5
- That's pretty much exactly what the economist said. -- nm - mafic Jun 29, 05:57
- I'm done with the wishful thinking. -- nm - Krusty Jun 29, 05:49 3
  - I'd like to believe that! -- nm - Reagen Jun 29, 05:57
  - [deleted] 1
    - Heh. :-) -- nm - Krusty Jun 29, 06:02

Post a message top

I'm a bit annoyed at the court for being so vague. They should have defined who counts and who doesn't. Leaving it up to the -- (edited)

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.