Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 11:17
2: Dec 3, 07:33
3: Dec 2, 17:22
4: Dec 2, 11:48
5: Dec 2, 08:21
6: Dec 1, 17:33
7: Dec 1, 11:23
8: Nov 30, 15:54
9: Nov 30, 09:41
10: Nov 29, 16:44
11: Nov 29, 08:01
12: Nov 28, 16:19
13: Nov 28, 09:42
14: Nov 27, 18:07
15: Nov 27, 12:04
16: Nov 27, 08:26
17: Nov 26, 18:06
18: Nov 26, 12:05
19: Nov 26, 08:29
20: Nov 25, 18:33
Posts: 151
Not familiar with the characters in today's IPO. Is this going be another Black Panther that bounces around for 20 years before maybe being made? -- nm
Posted by
GregW (aka not2fast)
Jul 8 '17, 09:54
(No message)
Responses:
Looks like they originally planned to IPO it at $90 then switched to $80. -- nm
-
Meg
Jul 8, 13:09
Nope. It's getting made. It has a tentative start for Fall 2017. -- nm*
-
Diva
Jul 8, 12:47
Success this weekend wil embolden them. -- nm
-
Spawndroid
Jul 8, 10:28
No call on the IPO, genuinely interested in seeing Black Panther tho. -- nm
-
budice
Jul 8, 10:13
*shrugh* Sony seems pretty serious in expanding the Spidey related properties -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 09:56
22
But not serious enough to make good Spider-Man movies. -- nm
-
David
Jul 8, 10:01
21
didn't like homecoming? -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:02
20
Giving Sony credit for that is like giving Art Garfunkel all the credit. -- nm
-
David
Jul 8, 10:05
2
Marvel did the same thing here that Sciere does for dogs. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jul 8, 10:06
1
Took it home, raised it for awhile, finds a nice family for it. -- nm
-
budice
Jul 8, 10:21
Not Sony alone, right? -- (edited)
-
Will Hunting
Jul 8, 10:03
16
oh yeah. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:09
15
So...Marvel = strong, Sony = weak enough to lose their crown jewel...so we're now putting faith in Sony again? -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jul 8, 10:14
14
Not at all. Sony isn't going to lose that crown jewel unless they want to. That's why they keep cranking out the movies....
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:21
13
If only Fox would do this with the FF franchise -- nm
-
eag
Jul 8, 10:26
2
I agree. But Feige is saying (at least right now) that kind of partnership isn't in the cards. And Fox is rumored to be making a FF cartoon. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:29
1
But with what looks like is gonna be a succesful Sony/Marvel colab
-
eag
Jul 8, 10:46
Sony was 1 movie away from killing their crown jewel. They went to Marvel so they'd still have one.
-
Will Hunting
Jul 8, 10:25
4
that's rewriting history. The Garfield movies made 1.4 Billion worldwide. Yeah Sony knew they had a problem and they fixed it. Smart on their part.
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:27
3
Right, they -only- made $1.4 billion worldwide. -- nm
-
David
Jul 8, 10:33
#4 and #5 had a 20% drop domestic and #5 finished literally half of what #1 did.
-
Will Hunting
Jul 8, 10:31
1
And the trendlines were all bad both here and overseas.
-
Will Hunting
Jul 8, 10:32
They had no problem ruining a potent brand with two Andrew Garfield movies.
-
David
Jul 8, 10:23
4
right because the 1st 3 Spider-man movies were failures. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:24
3
Same logic, feel free to buy into the Terminators. #1 and #2 were awesome.
-
Will Hunting
Jul 8, 10:26
*jazz hands* -- nm
-
Tim
Jul 8, 10:25
1
still made a ton of money. and sold a ton of toys. (and yeah it wasn't that good). -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 8, 10:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.