ST Alpha - "But not serious enough to make good Spider-Man movies. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "*shrugh* Sony seems pretty serious in expanding the Spidey related properties -- nm" by Remlik

But not serious enough to make good Spider-Man movies. -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Jul 8 '17, 10:01

(No message)

Responses:

didn't like homecoming? -- nm - Remlik Jul 8, 10:02 20
- Giving Sony credit for that is like giving Art Garfunkel all the credit. -- nm - David Jul 8, 10:05 2
  - Marvel did the same thing here that Sciere does for dogs. -- nm - Reagen Jul 8, 10:06 1
    - Took it home, raised it for awhile, finds a nice family for it. -- nm - budice Jul 8, 10:21
- Not Sony alone, right? -- (edited) - Will Hunting Jul 8, 10:03 16
  - oh yeah. -- nm - Remlik Jul 8, 10:09 15
    - So...Marvel = strong, Sony = weak enough to lose their crown jewel...so we're now putting faith in Sony again? -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 8, 10:14 14
      - Not at all. Sony isn't going to lose that crown jewel unless they want to. That's why they keep cranking out the movies.... - Remlik Jul 8, 10:21 13
        
        If only Fox would do this with the FF franchise -- nm - eag Jul 8, 10:26 2
        
        I agree. But Feige is saying (at least right now) that kind of partnership isn't in the cards. And Fox is rumored to be making a FF cartoon. -- nm - Remlik Jul 8, 10:29 1
        
        But with what looks like is gonna be a succesful Sony/Marvel colab - eag Jul 8, 10:46
        
        Sony was 1 movie away from killing their crown jewel. They went to Marvel so they'd still have one. - Will Hunting Jul 8, 10:25 4
        
        that's rewriting history. The Garfield movies made 1.4 Billion worldwide. Yeah Sony knew they had a problem and they fixed it. Smart on their part. - Remlik Jul 8, 10:27 3
        
        Right, they -only- made $1.4 billion worldwide. -- nm - David Jul 8, 10:33
        
        #4 and #5 had a 20% drop domestic and #5 finished literally half of what #1 did. - Will Hunting Jul 8, 10:31 1
        
        And the trendlines were all bad both here and overseas. - Will Hunting Jul 8, 10:32
        
        They had no problem ruining a potent brand with two Andrew Garfield movies. - David Jul 8, 10:23 4
        
        right because the 1st 3 Spider-man movies were failures. -- nm - Remlik Jul 8, 10:24 3
        
        Same logic, feel free to buy into the Terminators. #1 and #2 were awesome. - Will Hunting Jul 8, 10:26
        
        *jazz hands* -- nm - Tim Jul 8, 10:25 1
        
        still made a ton of money. and sold a ton of toys. (and yeah it wasn't that good). -- nm - Remlik Jul 8, 10:26

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.