Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Fine, pretend we pay attention to you and just forgot what you said.
"
by
ty97
I'm curious as well because I think my answer may be different. -- (link)
Posted by
ReluctantCynic (aka ReluctantCynic)
Jul 28 '17, 15:41
(No message)
Based on some similar experience early on in my current job.
(www.oregonlive.com)
Responses:
How is she NOT on 45s national security team? -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Jul 28, 18:00
I don't see how the first amendment *obligates* public employees to provide an avenue for citizens to contact them. It's a prohibition, not a mandate -- nm
-
Max
Jul 28, 15:43
6
[deleted]
It's the last clause of the First Amendment ...
-
ReluctantCynic
Jul 28, 16:23
4
But 1) Twitter-Blocking isn't a law passed by congress, 2) the person isn't denied access to Twitter, and 3) other avenues exist.
-
Max
Jul 28, 17:29
1
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
