ST Alpha - "To be clear, that would be 64th in pay among quarterbacks in the league. So it's basically ridiculous. You're talking about a guy you would -- (edited)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "this article is already being disputed, but its out there now - a different take on Kapernick -- (link)" by crash davis

To be clear, that would be 64th in pay among quarterbacks in the league. So it's basically ridiculous. You're talking about a guy you would -- (edited)

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) Aug 8 '17, 14:38

either bring in to be your starter, to create real competition for that job or at worst you would want him as back-up on a contending team as security if you lost your starter. Any of those positions warrant much higher pay. So saying that turning down an awful offer means he's trying to make a statement about race is a huge leap. For god's sake the bears are paying Mark Sanchez $2 million/yr. Mark Sanchez!!

Responses:

The 2018 Super Bowl champs paid their backup QB $540,000. They're your future champs and the Bears are a team in the NFC North. -- nm - crash davis Aug 8, 14:50 3
- I'm not sure how you see into the future to determine that, but that would have to be young, untested backups and a team willing to take that risk. - pmb Aug 8, 14:55 2
  - I feel it in my gut. The future is speaking to my gut. Ideally if I'm a GM, my backup is Terrelle Pryor so he can do other work to earn his money -- nm - crash davis Aug 8, 14:57 1
    - anyways check out #89, I don't expect Austin Davis to make it out of camp -- (link) - crash davis Aug 8, 15:02

Post a message top

To be clear, that would be 64th in pay among quarterbacks in the league. So it's basically ridiculous. You're talking about a guy you would -- (edited)

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.