ST Alpha - "not knowing anything about CGI, this strikes me as odd, but I'll believe it -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "CGI wolves are basically impossible to do correctly for some reason. -- nm" by Shaun

not knowing anything about CGI, this strikes me as odd, but I'll believe it -- nm

Posted by crash davis (aka crash davis) Aug 10 '17, 08:36

(No message)

Responses:

Lots of individual hairs, as I understand it. It can be done, but it takes a Pixar (Monsters Inc) or a WETA (PotA) for it to look any good, and - Roger More Aug 10, 08:44 7
- The latest PotA was weak story-wise but man oh man the effects. -- nm - Reagen Aug 10, 08:49 1
  - agreed. they're the closest we've come to life-like CGI characters yet. (spoilers) - Mel Profit Aug 10, 10:03
- I know I'm going to say 'doh!' but PotA? I've got a brain cloud and can only think of PotC -- nm - crash davis Aug 10, 08:46 2
  - Gollum as Ceasar. -- (edited) - Shaun Aug 10, 08:47 1
    - DOH! -- nm - crash davis Aug 10, 08:47
- Yeah, we listened to a feature-ette on either Brave or Tangled as to how hard it was do those CGI-hairs...just tough overall -- nm - Will Hunting Aug 10, 08:45 1
  - Brave. I recall them stating that Merida's hair was a technical marvel for CGI at the time. - Shaun Aug 10, 08:48
Even the new Beauty and the Beast had trash CGI wolves. -- nm - Shaun Aug 10, 08:39 1
- yeah, that scene didn't leave as big an impression on me as some of the others did -- nm - crash davis Aug 10, 08:43

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.