Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 180
In response to
"
80 relatives is really stretching the definition of *close* family -- nm
"
by
kilboooo
depends how many cousins one has. -- nm
Posted by
slutty zombie loosilu (aka loosilu)
Oct 30 '08, 13:30
(No message)
Responses:
I'm probably somewhere in the 60 range for first cousins. -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 30, 13:35
Still a lot. My mother is one of six and my father is one of five. All of them had two or more children and I still only get 48 close relatives. -- nm
-
Roger Morbid
Oct 30, 13:34
4
plus I think JD means 80 combined. -- nm
-
slutty zombie loosilu
Oct 30, 13:36
1
Yeah, I realised that as I was typing my response :) -- nm
-
Roger Morbid
Oct 30, 13:43
grandparents. your cousins's spouses and kids. etc. -- nm
-
slutty zombie loosilu
Oct 30, 13:35
1
I'm also forgetting the bride's family :) That would bump it up to about 100 easy. -- nm
-
Roger Morbid
Oct 30, 13:39
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
