ST Alpha - "Oh yes - but loosi's point was that the number of women relative to men is a far stronger indicator than the opposite way around." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 171

Oh yes - but loosi's point was that the number of women relative to men is a far stronger indicator than the opposite way around.

Posted by Roger Morbid (aka RogerMore) Oct 30 '08, 14:41

And therefore the "homosexual males = God's birth control" theory doesn't have any validity.

If there was a built-in population control feature in human DNA, it would take the form of more infertile women.

Responses:

[deleted]
Not being the "strongest indicator" doesn't necessarily drain ALL validity of my theory, dammit. - Dr.Vermin, being obnoxious Oct 30, 14:46 3
- Homosexuality isn't exactly encouraged and embraced in countries with high birth rates. -- nm - Roger Morbid Oct 30, 14:54 2
  - Exactly!!! -- nm - Dr.Vermin, rests case Oct 30, 14:55 1
    - But aren't places with high birth rates where you would expect there to be some sort of insidious population control? -- nm - Roger Morbid Oct 30, 14:58

Post a message top

Oh yes - but loosi's point was that the number of women relative to men is a far stronger indicator than the opposite way around.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.