Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 151
In response to
"
Personally,
"
by
Strongbad
I'm sure that having states run individual healthcare systems will work seamlessly. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Sep 20 '17, 13:41
(No message)
Responses:
It's how it's done in other federal countries like Canada and Australia. Of course there's massive redistributing of funds from the federal to the
-
Roger More
Sep 20, 13:44
6
And explicit standards of care. -- nm
-
Reagen
Sep 20, 13:58
1
Yep - though looking into it, even then there's wiggle room. In Canada, the provinces have to ensure that all medically necessary healthcare services
-
Roger More
Sep 20, 14:18
Our systems are pretty similar from provinces to provinces though. Not like the difference between a purely market driven system and single payer -- nm
-
Guigue
Sep 20, 13:50
3
Sure, but we also have general agreement across the country on how healthcare should be provided.
-
Roger More
Sep 20, 13:58
2
It makes less sense due to that lack of consensus. -- nm
-
David
Sep 20, 14:00
1
Not if the solution is a system that you don't like though. -- nm
-
Roger More
Sep 20, 14:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
