ST Alpha - "I'm not sure. It's not what you KNOW it's what you can prove. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "He should. He'll win. -- nm" by David

I'm not sure. It's not what you KNOW it's what you can prove.

Posted by Volnelk Oct 15 '17, 15:35

It's obvious to everyone at this point when you look around the league that he is clearly better than many guys getting signed, but to prove collusion in court? Seems like you'd need a seriously smoking gun and not just fantasy stats from a bunch of schleps.

Responses:

mel and I had a similar conversation. Just show game film from some of these matchups. Case proved. -- nm - Diva Oct 15, 15:47 5
- this belongs under David's post. -- nm - Diva Oct 15, 15:48 4
  - Right, I understand Volnelk's post, but there's no rational argument that every QB on an NFL roster right now is better than him. - David Oct 15, 16:00 3
    - my question is does he have to prove that they actively conspired against him (like all got together and decided nobody would sign him), or - mafic Oct 15, 17:23
    - I thoroughly agree. -- nm - Diva Oct 15, 16:08 1
      - I also agree and it doesn't matter. -- nm - Volnelk Oct 15, 16:44
Game film of Kevin Hogan today makes his case. -- nm - David Oct 15, 15:43

Post a message top

I'm not sure. It's not what you KNOW it's what you can prove.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.