ST Alpha - "I don't see how that really changes anything. I assume my will would stipulate that my ex-wife would be guardians of the children. And vice-versa." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Well that sounds horrible. -- nm" by Mop

I don't see how that really changes anything. I assume my will would stipulate that my ex-wife would be guardians of the children. And vice-versa.

Posted by Mop (aka rburriel) Oct 16 '17, 14:20

So if we both die, the will doesn't shed much light on that.

Responses:

And also, you really do not want to assume anything when it comes to your kids. - groiny Oct 16, 14:25
The will would have a secondary clause saying who the back up is. -- nm - Andie Oct 16, 14:21 9
- yup, not to mention issues with money, and whoever is responsible for kids in that event, how much access to that money that they get. -- nm - groiny Oct 16, 14:24 8
  - You mean my debt? -- nm - Mop Oct 16, 14:26 7
    - well, sure, I am sure that too. You have to have life insurance? -- nm - groiny Oct 16, 14:28 6
      - Through work. My ex-wife is the beneficiary and then the kids. -- nm - Mop Oct 16, 14:30 5
        
        and what happens if the kids are not 18, and the ex is not responsible? -- nm - groiny Oct 16, 14:35 1
        
        Or the kids are 18 and are irresponsible. -- nm - spamlet Oct 16, 14:59
        
        Not to harp, but if anyone that said no to having a will needed a will? It's you. -- nm - Bacon Oct 16, 14:31 2
        
        I fear what would happen if my sister in law, or brother in law, were to end up somehow responsible for my kids. - groiny Oct 16, 14:42 1
        
        Yikes!! Wow, yeah, not good. Glad you have that buttoned up -- nm - Bacon Oct 16, 14:47

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.