In response to
"LIR: ty97, that is the archetypal "earmark" and illustrates exactly the criticisms against earmarks that folks were raising at the time."
by
ReluctantCynic
|
fwiw, I've never been opposed to all of them, for some of the things you list there.
|
for better or worse about other random things, they also helped fund a lot of good research, including for medical-related things; and, without them, it became way harder to procure that.
of course, it would be better if they weren't needed; but reality.
|
Responses:
|