SCOTUS: Supreme Court rejects Texas case on gay-marriage benefits. Right to a marriage license did not entitle same-sex couples to spousal benefits under employee insurance plans. -- (link*)
Posted by
budice
Dec 4 '17, 11:04
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
-
Is that limited to texas, or will other states adopt? Worse is it applies nationally? -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Dec 4, 11:27
-
So this applies to opposite sex marriages, too? What if it’s based on race? Your spouse is Hispanic? No benefits for them! -- nm
-
Mop
Dec 4, 11:20
-
That's some bullshit. I can't imagine how they came to the conclusion. -- nm
-
Krusty
Dec 4, 11:17
1
-
F*cking Texas. -- nm
-
znufrii
Dec 4, 11:14
1
-
arrg, these headlines are confounding. Give me the what-it-means, not the technical ruling.
-
Max
Dec 4, 11:10
12
-
Lawmaker proposes during Australian same-sex marriage debate -- (link)
-
Remlik
Dec 4, 11:08
|