|
In response to
"SCOTUS: Supreme Court rejects Texas case on gay-marriage benefits. Right to a marriage license did not entitle same-sex couples to spousal benefits under employee insurance plans. -- (link*)"
by
budice
|
arrg, these headlines are confounding. Give me the what-it-means, not the technical ruling.
Posted by
Max
Dec 4 '17, 11:10
|
"Supreme Court Holds Same-Sex Couples Separate From Spousal Rights" or a dozen different wordings would be more informative.
|
Responses:
|
