Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Nationwide median income is a fairly useless measure by any standard. -- nm
"
by
mafic
What's a better national metric of wealth and buying power, then? -- nm
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Dec 18 '17, 04:21
(No message)
Responses:
Applying a nationwide median on a local level is stupid.
-
mafic
Dec 18, 04:27
it's kind of irrelevant to the issue at play. Local costs of living make national medians moot. -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 18, 04:24
19
Seeing that we are discussing federal income tax changes, I think it's very appropriate to consider national measures of wealth and income. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Dec 18, 04:28
18
Sure, so making $60k in rural Louisiana and NYC is exactly the same then. -- nm
-
mafic
Dec 18, 04:29
17
If you’re applying median income across the board that’s what you’re saying, that local circumstance doesn’t matter, only average. -- nm
-
mafic
Dec 18, 04:59
...which is something I've never stated, but keep going. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Dec 18, 04:32
15
...but that's what gets assumed when you use national measure of wealth and income.
-
Inigo
Dec 18, 04:36
14
Completely disagree.
-
Strongbad
Dec 18, 04:45
13
I don't think you truly understand how cost of living works, then. -- nm
-
Inigo
Dec 18, 04:48
12
I refuse to define "middle class" on a sliding scale from state to state, or district to district
-
Strongbad
Dec 18, 05:02
3
You're wrong. I've lived it. -- nm
-
CQ
Dec 18, 05:07
1
I've lived it too.
-
Strongbad
Dec 18, 05:23
But tons of people live in those cities and areas, like millions and stuff. -- (edited)
-
Inigo
Dec 18, 05:06
I think his point is 60k is different place to place, but 750k isn't. I tend to agree.
-
volnelk
Dec 18, 04:54
7
With cost of living, the wages are much higher, and the cost of everything is higher.
-
Inigo
Dec 18, 05:00
5
I get it. The point is that it's difficult to compare people from the two markets as the same.
-
volnelk
Dec 18, 05:25
4
Which with your example inside that might make the one Ohio person lower middle class while the LA person might be upper middle. -- (edited)
-
Inigo
Dec 18, 05:29
they may or may not. In my Halifax/Vancouver comparison, we'd be spending most of our available income on housing with no room for vacations
-
Reagen
Dec 18, 05:28
Thank you for explaining this better than I am. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Dec 18, 05:26
1
Even if I do accept your premise (which I do not - two can play at this game, wheeee!)
-
Reagen
Dec 18, 05:30
but choices are driven by location.
-
Reagen
Dec 18, 04:59
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.