ST Alpha - "Is it more liability than they're facing for killing an innocent person?" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "Because they have to take threats at their word, due to the risk of it being an actual life or death situation." by znufrii

Is it more liability than they're facing for killing an innocent person?

Posted by David (aka David) Dec 30 '17, 14:56

We live in an era where it's not hard to verify an identity. These current practices seem archaic, which is why punk kids are able to manipulate them.

Responses:

Not to mention why would an assailant be interested in providing that information? - znufrii Dec 30, 14:59 6
- I don't follow your reasoning. Did you mean to say assailant? -- nm - David Dec 30, 15:00 5
  - That's what this call was. The prankster/murderer was claiming to be the assailant, holding his family hostage. - znufrii Dec 30, 15:01 4
    - I really don't follow you. Why would you think such an assertion shouldn't require due diligence? -- nm - David Dec 30, 15:05 3
      - It should. And it should also require a response to protect against a potential threat to public safety. - znufrii Dec 30, 15:41 1
        
        They could have done something as easy as call the home, or the neighbors -- nm - . Dec 30, 15:50
      - its more fun being an ahole when you have an audience -- nm - zeitgeist Dec 30, 15:20

Post a message top

Is it more liability than they're facing for killing an innocent person?

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.