Backboards: 
Posts: 161

I do think her handling of it was a fair story/question TBH. But after what she wrote, people are critiquing

when she released it, some of the things she included in it that the see as direct swipes (like the NYT reference, definitely direct, and definitely fair IMO) or perceived indirect swipes (I sometimes hired the wrong people perceived as swipe at Patti Sollis Doyle, not as clear to me, but I remember the media dragging Patti Sollis Doyle through the coals as ineffective). And even critiquing her for her follow-up on twitter where she tweeted out that she wrote about it and that the entire subject was never touch on SOTU.

We could argue all day where the treatment of Clinton is on the Goldilocks scale: too harsh (possibly, not sure tough), to soft (nope), just right (again, not sure). But put that aside. Why is the current President of the United States held to the same standard. And he's simply not.

And this comes from both left and right. It's infuriating.


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.