ST Alpha - "I won't link it because cheaters need to do their own work, but I just read there's a way to cheat at HQ, ~75% accuracy." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

I won't link it because cheaters need to do their own work, but I just read there's a way to cheat at HQ, ~75% accuracy.

Posted by b. (aka starrynit) Jan 31 '18, 14:52

I haven't played yet, because its timing has sucked for me; but knowing that's out there, and at least one person admits they've won using it, makes me not want to, at least not with thinking I'm playing against others.

I've stopped playing other games over the years (that boggle-type one that st did for a while, for one) because I realized some players just had to be cheating, ugh.

Responses:

We get lagged out before we even hear the question pretty regularly. I don't know how people have time to google, too. -- nm - David Jan 31, 16:03
I've never played HQ but from the little I know about this, this surprises me. -- nm - ty97 Jan 31, 15:30
It occurs to me you could use an Echo/Home and have it hear the Q. -- nm - Reagen Jan 31, 15:00 3
- is that fast enough? - b. Jan 31, 15:03 2
  - You certainly couldn't do any kind of googling without a bot or a really fast typing group each taking a potential answer. At least not consistently. - ralph wiggum Jan 31, 15:28 1
    - oh, that reminded me that I saw an image somewhere from someone who won - was playing with others and they had 3 phones together doing that kind of - b. Jan 31, 15:32

Post a message top

I won't link it because cheaters need to do their own work, but I just read there's a way to cheat at HQ, ~75% accuracy.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.