Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 171
In response to
"
Slate: Yes, the MLK Jr. Estate Approved That Ram Trucks Super Bowl Ad -- (link)
"
by
Strongbad
Wait, this was in question? I doubt the network would have aired it without knowing this. -- nm
Posted by
Spawn: Six Time Blood Feud Champion (aka Spawn)
Feb 6 '18, 09:09
(No message)
Responses:
Given the social media backlash and freakoutery, I guess an explanation was required? -- nm
-
Strongbad
Feb 6, 09:11
6
And the statement from the foundation that they were not involved probably served to confuse things. -- nm
-
znufrii
Feb 6, 09:13
2
It might not be national knowledge, but there has been a TON of legal battles over the years between members of the King family. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Feb 6, 09:16
1
That is completely unsurprising. -- nm
-
znufrii
Feb 6, 09:18
It was still a ridiculous ad, regardless of the approval. -- nm
-
ty97
Feb 6, 09:13
1
It was no, "Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet."
-
Spawn: Six Time Blood Feud Champion
Feb 6, 09:15
Ah. People *do* like to look for things to bitch about. -- nm
-
Spawn: Six Time Blood Feud Champion
Feb 6, 09:12
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
