Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 154
why is that any different than age? -- nm
Posted by
groiny (aka groiny)
Mar 7 '18, 10:03
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
Because federal law has clearly established that age is not a protected category in all cases. There are age restrictions already on firearms.
-
crash davis
Mar 7, 10:06
11
yes, those restrictions say he has to be 18 to buy a rifle.
-
groiny
Mar 7, 10:09
7
[deleted]
6
I would think, at the very least, that his lawyer must at least think he has a valid argument.
-
groiny
Mar 7, 10:13
5
I suspect he’s getting paid regardless. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 7, 10:16
3
I highly doubt that this "kid" is going to pay crazy legal fees to make a point.
-
groiny
Mar 7, 10:18
2
[deleted]
I can’t imagine there are any other organizations out there who would want to contribute in order to score a legal victory for gun sales. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 7, 10:20
[deleted]
[deleted]
2
I'm going to bet that firearms will be found to fall into the same category as alcohol in the state, insofar as restrictions are legal. -- nm
-
crash davis
Mar 7, 10:11
1
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
