Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Wait, they're doing this for environmental reasons?
"
by
Will Hunting, King of Blood Feud
Livestock are a big driver in climate change.
Posted by
TWuG (aka TWuG)
Jul 16 '18, 08:37
Both in land and other resources, as well as methane emmisions from the animals.
Responses:
So, wouldn't killing some of those animals be best?
-
Will Hunting, King of Blood Feud
Jul 16, 08:40
5
The methane emissions are a tiny part of it
-
Reagen
Jul 16, 09:12
2
and water. "It takes more than 2,400 gallons of water to produce just 1 pound of meat. Only 25 gallons of water are required to grow 1 pound of wheat. -- nm
-
amanda
Jul 16, 09:14
1
This is why there are all those campaigns for, like 'Meatless Mondays', etc. If everybody ate even slightly less meat, it would have a dramatic impact -- nm
-
Andie
Jul 16, 09:17
slow your roll Thanos -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 16, 08:55
No, because it increases the demand for meat, which means more animals. -- nm
-
Roger More
Jul 16, 08:42
yep -- nm
-
Andie
Jul 16, 08:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.