Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Livestock are a big driver in climate change.
"
by
TWuG
So, wouldn't killing some of those animals be best?
Posted by
Will Hunting, King of Blood Feud (aka JoeMetz)
Jul 16 '18, 08:40
if 100 cows fart a metric ton, eat 10 and save 10% of the fart volume.
Plus, steaks. This is why hippies shouldn't think.
Responses:
The methane emissions are a tiny part of it
-
Reagen
Jul 16, 09:12
2
and water. "It takes more than 2,400 gallons of water to produce just 1 pound of meat. Only 25 gallons of water are required to grow 1 pound of wheat. -- nm
-
amanda
Jul 16, 09:14
1
This is why there are all those campaigns for, like 'Meatless Mondays', etc. If everybody ate even slightly less meat, it would have a dramatic impact -- nm
-
Andie
Jul 16, 09:17
slow your roll Thanos -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 16, 08:55
No, because it increases the demand for meat, which means more animals. -- nm
-
Roger More
Jul 16, 08:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.